Home Print this page Email this page Users Online: 304
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 1  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 79-81

Preparation and readability assessment of patient information leaflets for diabetic foot ulcers


1 Department of Pharmacy Practice, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal, Karnataka, India
2 Department of General Surgery, Kasturba Medical College Hospital, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka, India

Date of Web Publication20-Jul-2013

Correspondence Address:
M Sonal Sekhar
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal University, Manipal - 576 104, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2321-0656.115304

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Context: Patient counseling is the mainstay for prevention and management of diabetic foot ulcer. Hence, patient information leaflet (PIL) can act as an educational material for imparting patient education regarding diabetic foot care for better patient outcome. Aim: The objective of this study was to develop and to assess the readability of PIL for diabetic foot ulcer. Materials and Methods: Various online resources such as "Patient UK" and Micromedex data base were used to prepare PILs on diabetic foot ulcer. Physicians were validated the content of the leaflet. Leaflet was designed and modified according to the physician's suggestions. PILs-readability was checked online by using the website "www.readability-score.com" and calculated Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) and Flesch-Kincaid grade level (FK-GL). Layout and design features of the PILs were assessed by using Baker Able Leaflets Design (BALD) method. Results: Readability of the leaflet was assessed by using the FRE and FK-GL scores. After initial assessment leaflets were modified to achieve ideal readability scores. The best FRE score achieved was 69.9 and FK-GL score achieved was 7.1. The BALD score was 27. Conclusions: PILs prepared had ideal readability score and layout design. The leaflet's estimated FRE and FK-GL scores rate showed that it was fairly easy readable.

Keywords: Diabetic foot ulcer, patient education, patient information leaflets


How to cite this article:
Roy RT, Sekhar M S, Rodrigues GS, Rajesh V. Preparation and readability assessment of patient information leaflets for diabetic foot ulcers. J Soc Health Diabetes 2013;1:79-81

How to cite this URL:
Roy RT, Sekhar M S, Rodrigues GS, Rajesh V. Preparation and readability assessment of patient information leaflets for diabetic foot ulcers. J Soc Health Diabetes [serial online] 2013 [cited 2018 Dec 18];1:79-81. Available from: http://www.joshd.net/text.asp?2013/1/2/79/115304


  Introduction Top


Patient education is "the process by which health-care professionals and others impart information to patients that will modify their health behaviors or improve their health status." [1] It is one of the major management strategies for preventing and treating diabetic foot ulcer. Diabetic foot ulcerations and amputations have a severe impact on individual and society. This can destroy patient's ability to earn their livelihood and can also adversely affect their quality-of-life. Patient involvement is vital for the successful care of diabetic foot ulceration. The principal task of the health-care team is to give the patient awareness, boost self-confidence and provide support. Usually, patients with diabetic complications and their families provide 95% of their care themselves. [2] Hence, patient education to improve self-management care are central components of any effective treatment plan.

Various studies had suggested that diabetes complications could be reduced by good blood glucose control. [3] The glycemic control is dependent on various factors such as the patient's adherence to medications, life-style modifications and frequent monitoring of blood glucose. This is highly influenced by effective patient education and counseling. Studies had also shown a low-level of knowledge, attitude and care among patients with diabetes and complications. [4] This suggested the need for awareness program for patients to improve their knowledge regarding the disease. Therefore, each health-care professional including nurses and clinical pharmacists, being indispensable partner of the health-care squad have an inevitable responsibility for counseling these patients.

There were several studies, which had shown the positive impact of patient counseling in the management of diabetic foot ulcer. [5],[6] Malone et al., (1989) assessed the effectiveness of diabetic foot education by randomizing 103 patients (203 limbs) (received an hour foot care education) and 100 patients (193 limbs) (received an hour of general diabetes mellitus education) for 24 months. [5] The result showed a lower incidence of foot ulcers in the group that received foot care education. Similarly, Litzelman et al., (1993) conducted educational sessions on foot care; and gave telephonic and postal card reminders in 191 patients and 205 patients provided with standard care to for a period of 12 months. They noted fewer serious foot lesions in the group, which received sessions on foot care; and telephone and postcard reminders. [6] Patients and their family members or care givers should understand the implications of the loss of protective sensation and the importance of daily foot examinations and proper foot care. Ultimately, patient education was the key for prevention and management of diabetic complications. Most of the time, diabetes patients were not adequately educated regarding the foot care. They need to be conscious about the risk factors of foot complications and its management for better health outcome.

The Flesch/Flesch-Kincaid readability tests were designed to show comprehension difficulty while reading a passage of academic English in contemporary style. This comprised of two tests: The Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) and the Flesch-Kincaid grade level (FK-GL). In the FRE test, higher scores indicated that the content was easier to read, whereas lower scores indicated that the content were difficult to read. The Simplified Measure of Gobbledygoop (SMOG) grade is a readability measure that estimates the years of education required to fully understand a piece of writing.

The purpose of this study was to prepare the patient information leaflet (PIL) for diabetic foot ulcer and to assess the readability.


  Materials and Methods Top


Preparation of leaflet in english language for diabetic foot ulcer

PILs [Figure 1] were developed by referring various model leaflets, which were available from different online sources such as "Patient UK." [7],[8] The search was also supplemented by gathering information from Micromedex database. The content of the leaflet was validated by physicians. Changes were made as per physician's directions and leaflet was designed accordingly.
Figure 1: (a-c) Patient information leaflets for diabetic foot ulcert

Click here to view


Assessment of FRE and FK-GL scores for readability

Readability of the PIL was checked online by calculating FRE and FK-GL by using the website "www.readability-score.com". [9] Baker Able Leaflets Design (BALD) method was used to assess the layout and design characteristics of the PIL.


  Results Top


During the preparation of leaflet, readability was assessed using FRE and FK-GL scores. After assessment leaflets were modified and readability scores were reassessed, which showed improvement after each modification [Table 1]. The best FRE score achieved was 69.9 and FK-GL score achieved was 7.1. The BALD score was 27.
Table 1: Flesch/Flesch-Kincaid readability tests score

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


FK-GL scores translate into numerical grade. The FRE measures textual difficulty, which indicates how easy a text is to read. The FRE scale measures readability as 100 (Very easy to read), 65 (Plain English), 30 (A little hard to read) and 0 (Very hard to read). Gunning fog index calculates the years of formal education wanted to understand the text on a first reading. It is mainly used to verify whether the text can be read easily by the intended audience. Texts for a wide audience generally require fog index less than 12. SMOG index readability formula measures the years of education a person needs to fully understand a piece of writing. Automated Readability Index is a readability test used to assess the understand ability of a text. Coleman Liau Index to gauge the understand ability of a text. FK-GL score of 7.1 is equivalent to 7 th grade reading level in the United States. The FRE score of 69.9 indicates that the text is fairly readable. Fog index score of 9.4 represents that it is readable and more understandable by the wide range of audience. SMOG Index score of 6.9 is equivalent to 6 th or 7 th grade reading level in the United States. Automated Reading level grade 7.4 corresponds to the typical reading level of a 14 year-old in the US. In Coleman Liau Index, the text is at a grade level of 11.1 or roughly appropriate for a 1 st year undergraduate.


  Conclusion Top


Developed PIL had standard readability score and good layout design. FRE and FK-GL scores rate had shown that the leaflet was fairly easily readable.


  Acknowledgments Top


We deeply express sour profound and sincere gratitude to Manipal University and Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences for the valuable guidance and encouragement.

 
  References Top

1.Koongstvedt PR. The Managed Health Care Handbook. 4 th ed. Philadelphia: Aspen Publishers Inc.; 2001.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Palaian S, Chhetri AK, Prabhu M, Rajan S, Shankar PR. Role of pharmacist on counselling diabetes patients. Internet J Pharmacol 2005;4:1-13. Available from: http://www.archive.ispub.com/journal/the-internet-journal-of-pharmacology/volume-4-number-1/role-of-pharmacist-in-counseling-diabetes-patients.html#sthash.UmAGSM70.dpuf. [Last accessed on 2013 Feb 12].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Genuth S, Eastman R, Kahn R, Klein R, Lachin J, Lebovitz H, et al. Implications of the United kingdom prospective diabetes study. Diabetes Care 2003;26 Suppl 1:S28-32.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Al-Maskari F, El-Sadig M, Al-Kaabi JM, Afandi B, Nagelkerke N, Yeatts KB. Knowledge, attitude and practices of diabetic patients in the United Arab Emirates. PLoS One 2013;8:e52857.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Malone JM, Snyder M, Anderson G, Bernhard VM, Holloway GA Jr, Bunt TJ. Prevention of amputation by diabetic education. Am J Surg 1989;158:520-3.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Litzelman DK, Slemenda CW, Langefeld CD, Hays LM, Welch MA, Bild DE, et al. Reduction of lower extremity clinical abnormalities in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1993;119:36-41.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Available from: http://www.patient.co.uk/health/Diabetes,-Foot-Care-and-Foot-Ulcers.htm. [Last accessed on 2013 Feb 12].  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Available from: http://www.coloplast.com/woundandskincare/topics/woundknowledge/diabetic foot ulcers/diabetic foot ulcers leaflet. [Last accessed on 2013 Feb 20].  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Available from: http://www.readability-score.com. [Last accessed on 2013 Feb 12].  Back to cited text no. 9
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]


This article has been cited by
1 Readability Evaluations of Veterinary Client Handouts and Implications for Patient Care
Kenneth D. Royal,April Kedrowicz
Topics in Companion Animal Medicine. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Preparation, validation and user-testing of pictogram-based patient information leaflets for tuberculosis
Anmol Shrestha,V. Rajesh,Sneha Shamrao Dessai,Sharon Mary Stanly,Uday Venkat Mateti
Pulmonary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2018; 51: 26
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Impact of patient-education on health related quality of life of diabetic foot ulcer patients: A randomized study
M. Sonal Sekhar,M.K. Unnikrishnan,K. Vijayanarayana,Gabriel Sunil Rodrigues
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Development and Evaluation of Patient Information Leaflet for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Patients
Sonal Sekhar M,Unnikrishnan MK,Navya Vyas,Gabriel Sunil Rodrigues
International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2017; In Press(In Press)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Preparation, validation and user-testing of pictogram-based patient information leaflets for hemodialysis patients
Uday Venkat Mateti,Anantha Naik Nagappa,Ravindra Prabhu Attur,Manohar Bairy,Shankar Prasad Nagaraju,Surulivelrajan Mallayasamy,Rajesh Vilakkathala,Vasudev Guddattu,Rajesh Balkrishnan
Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 2015; 23(6): 621
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Acknowledgments
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4463    
    Printed195    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded402    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 5    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]